If This Blog Existed in 1996 [Weekend Treat]

A terrifying glimpse of what could have been (click to enlarge), thanks to the Geocities-izer:

H/t Geekosystem


WaPo Exec.: “Wait And See” Before Pay Walls

For District residents who spend a lot of the day in front of computers, refreshing news sites or even just clicking the occasional link from a friend, an open way to get to content on local newspaper sites is pretty crucial. If you are one of those people, you are likely wondering if it will stay that way forever here in D.C., especially since other major newspapers are either planning or have already built subscription models that will impact how and at what cost we can have access.

Of course, given the prestige of the Washington Post in the journalism community, there are lots of people interested more than just cube dwellers about what its business plains entail in this regard. The answer? To be determined (and not in the Albritton kind of way). Speaking to a collection of student journalists from the Harvard Crimson over the weekend, Washington Post Co. Vice Chairman Boisfeuillet Jones, Jr. said the paper would “watch and see what happens before we jump into something like [the New York Times' upcoming metered model].”

Jones did mention that something is likely in the works, but there is at least a little bit of time before we know for sure what will happen to the news we get from WashingtonPost.com.

Crossposted at WeLoveDC.com.


Blast from the Pasts: AOL Sells ICQ

I am totally having a nostalgic 1.0-Internet month. First there was another Napster post added to the catalog, there was a lot of fun with Geocities yesterday (more on that later) and now part of me is coping with another part of my Internet past ticking away.

ICQ, one of the first wide-spread IM desktop platforms, has been sold to a Russian communications company, Digital Sky Technologies. Now, I don’t know anyone who has heard the famed “Uh-oh” in the last decade – AOL picked up the owning company in the late 90s and a lot of the tools likely ended up in future desktop versions of AOL’s Instant Messenger. Still, ICQ was definitely a helpful part of consumer digital adoption after it launched in 1996.

Like e-mail, I wouldn’t guess that instant messaging is going anywhere, as both are an incredible example of the universality and immediacy that a digital connection can give to communications. Sure, we’ve moved from ICQ user numbers to alphanumeric screen names involving the words “Baller” and then finally to our actual names with Gmail – and this waning anonymity is something of which I’m sure Dan Kennedy would approve – but the technology is not greatly different since the early days of the platform.

One of my favorite arguments is the importance of Peer-2-Peer file sharing in the revolution of a share-first information economy. I’d be wrong to exclude the progression from IRC into IMing as another way the process became more normalized for the general user. ICQ was a good step along the way. I could have left this at my terrible first attempt at humor on this (“In Soviet Russia, ICQ Seeks You”), but, a fond salute on the way back to the mother country is probably acceptable enough.

Adios, ICQ. You taught us to crawl.

(via Mashable)


Today in Glorious Free Daily Headlines

“Obama Disses White Guys.”

I love the Examiner, in so many ways. If not for the fact that they made Drudge’s headline (“OBAMA PLAYS RACE CARD: RALLIES BLACKS, LATINOS FOR ’10 UPSET…”) on the same story seem rational.


How The Red Sox Taught Me About Patient Communities

Fenway Park

There’s a very specific bond that happens among native New Englanders around our baseball team. We love our team, and from April to October, no matter where we’ve been displaced, we sometimes act like we live and die by the Boston Red Sox. Well, things haven’t exactly started off great this spring for my team; however, I still spend about three hours nearly every evening tracking games on my mobile phone, tweeting about the most recent developments, and looking to gather resources from blogs and influential fan voices.

It isn’t rare for people to treat their sports teams as if they were family, and when you are that invested into something, you sometimes look for communities to join to help cope with the emotional toll. This is by no means an anomaly to fandom, and the ironic realization for me came because the early season has left my team on figurative life support. There are a lot of comparisons to the way supporters of sports teams interact in communities online with how those facing a health condition act.

My experience in health and patient communities is from the outside looking in, as a researcher, but from what I’ve seen, the metaphor works well to discuss some of the mechanisms of online patient groups. Here are five ways to look at the way those communities work – thanks to Red Sox Nation.

Community on the Good Days

Any time the Red Sox do something right, my Twitter and Facebook feeds often ignite with the news; I basically have an immediate group to celebrate the little victories throughout the marathon-like baseball season. There are definite parallels in health support communities online. For a great example, check out the nature of messages on a forum among those trying to quit smoking, and you’d see that the stories of success are just as frequent – if not more so – than posts about needing advice.

…And the Bad Days

Tough losses happen during a long season, and any team can go into a slump that often brings the spirits of its fan base with it, but online gives us a way to rally together and remind each other that it’s going to be alright in the next game. Patients in an online support community often seek similar traits of support, albeit around significantly more serious matters. Still, the gentle reminder to “not abandon blowouts” is applicable to both situations. A quick glance on some of the posts in a support group like Inspire will show that the need for a helpful ear and someone to say, “It’ll get better,” isn’t hard to find.

Establishing Personal Connections

There are definitely different sizes of patient communities online – some are really specific, and by the nature, much smaller. Even in some of the bigger groups, though, participants still get to know each other and build bonds of trust and credibility. Baseball works the same way: the Red Sox may have a larger national footprint than other clubs, but there is still a tight group that forms. There are some people who I’ve first been in touch with via Twitter or a community, and later gotten to know beyond what they discuss about baseball. A great example is the community around diabetes: even through a broad, diverse group of bloggers and support forums who retain their personal voices while discussing the condition.

Anytime, Anywhere Support Groups

With a mobile connection or wireless access, I can find my fellow members of Red Sox Nation just about wherever I may be. Since the community exists online, I can log in anywhere to rejoice or seek support with my fellow fans. Patient communities enjoy the same universality: the opportunity to find someone with the right experience and history around even the rarest conditions is possible, and it can be done at any time of the day on Twitter, a group on Patients Like Me or on blogs.

A Way to Get Involved

It doesn’t matter if it’s sports fandom or a health condition, the emotional investment in something is often what keeps people coming back to the community as it becomes a part of their life. One of the aspects of participatory medicine (the idea supporting the engaged patient movement) is that the online connection makes it possible for the individual to be more involved in their own healthcare, empowering them to feel more a part of their own health improvement. This is where the metaphor stops: talking about my team isn’t going to make the Sox win any more games (although it’s definitely cathartic), but for patients, getting involved can have definite impacts on their outlook for the future, health and happiness.

Originally posted at Edelman Digital. Image credit: werkunz1

 

 

 


Defining News, Stewart Style [Quote of the Day]

“…uh, comedians do social comentary through comedy. That’s how its worked for thousands of years. I have not moved out of the comedian’s box into the news box. The news box is moving towards me.”

Jon Stewart responding to Bernie Goldberg’s accusations against his biases on last night’s The Daily Show.

For a recap of one of the most epic episodes in recent memory, check out Colby Hall’s full coverage at Mediaite.


Grammar Police on the Move: NYT Misses Everyone’s Favorite Style Change

Geeks everywhere were a clamor last Friday afternoon when the Associated Press made a small – but hyperbolically important – adjustment to its Stylebook (the generally accepted standard for journalists and professional writers).

Announcing the revision in a tweet – just in case you didn’t think this could get geekier – the AP Stylebook changed the proper style for writing about Internet sites. Previously, to the chagrin of journalism and PR majors everywhere, we dealt with Web site (capital W, two words); this has roots in the concept of a “World Wide Web site,” now anachronistic given that the WWW is rarely mentioned*. With the change, it’s been simplified to a single concept: website.

That change was put into place three days ago, so I should be a little lenient when it comes to adopting the new format. However, you couldn’t swing a corded telephone in a newsroom without hitting someone talking about the shift; it was a seriously huge to-do to us nerds, so much so that Mashable’s article has been retweeted close to 2,500 times as of this morning. And what happens today in a headline at the New York Times? There it is, sticking out like a sore thumb. Web site. Two words. It hurts:

Yes, I’m crazy. It’s early. Just enjoy.

*An interesting aside: RWW reported this morning that Google Chrome is going to try and kickstart another style change in the Web world: ditching “http://,” in Web addresses. That’s really geeky, though, so I’m not going to go there.


Why I Love DC [Weekend Treat]

I’ve been authoring a piece here and there for We Love DC over the past few months. As part of my contributing, I get the opportunity to share some of my thoughts on this fair city I’ve ended up in. Not the normal “weekend treat” fair because it waxes philosophic instead of provides humor, but I’m allowed that every now and then:

I’m a nomad. I haven’t been settled in anything since I’ve been ten years old when my family uprooted to move across the nation from suburban Boston to the Sonoran Desert. The joke among many of my friends is that I have no home. I’ve jumped back to the east coast for college, switched states again for grad school and then wound up here in D.C. If I was ever a professional athlete – highly unlikely at this point, but I’m not ruling it out completely – the back of my trading card would just say, “Hometown: Not Applicable.” But for some reason, that seems completely ok here.

Read the whole piece at We Love DC.

Image (cc) Flickr user gingher


In Which I Agree with the British Prime Minister [Quote of the Day]

“People will pay for certain things, and should pay for certain things, but I think there’s a whole sort of element of communication that’s got to be free…people mind paying for basic news.”

Gordon Brown, Prime Minister, U.K.

via Shaping the Future of the Newspaper


Napster v. Metallica, 10 Years Later

A hat tip to Anthony De Rosa for reminding me that today is the anniversary of one of the most infamous moments in the Bubble 1.0 era: Metallica bringing suit against Napster for file trading of its music on the P2P music sharing network.

As an April 2000 Wired article told of the news:

Heavy metal band Metallica has always been synonymous with music that is played fast and loud. After filing a lawsuit Thursday, the band might become more famous as the first group to strike a chord against music piracy on the Net.

Metallica filed a lawsuit against Napster in the US District Court, Central District of California, alleging that the company encourages piracy by enabling and allowing its users to trade copyrighted songs through its servers.

The suit also names the University of Southern California, Yale University, and Indiana University, institutions which, ironically, have attempted to deal with the problems associated with students’ use of Napster on campus networks.

The RIAA has sent cease-and-desist letters to school administrators advising them of the copyright violations involved, but until now none of the universities have been sued.

The suit alleges that Napster has violated three different areas of the law: copyright infringements, unlawful use of digital audio interface device, and the Racketeering Influenced & Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).

Anthony linked to the story to point out the irony: Metallica is still raking in gobs of money, and Napster is owned by a major electronics commercial entity. 10 years later, the file sharing world still very much exists, but not through the way Napster once built it upon.

The topic of Napster has always been one of my favorites to cover. The Metallica story was the first technology story I ever covered while writing in my high school’s paper, and I think the service truly has an important part in the digital culture of today. The technology of trading music, and eventually files, became mainstreamed through Napster, thanks in part to a storm of activity that coincided with the beginnings of High Speed Access in homes as well as other supporting technologies such as CD-R and flash memory developing beyond Zip Drives.

More than anything, Napster taught the average user that they could share things online. Files were just the beginning, but an important mindset shift that made the idea of Web 2.0 possible throughout the 2000s. As I wrote a few years ago:

What did MP3s do? Within the gray-lines of the DMCA, we took massive files of music that were seemingly tethered down, and made them digestible quantities of only a couple of megs (true geek moment here: at the average 128 kbps, the 3 minutes song clocks in pretty close to the 4 mb range. In wav or cd formats, that’s about 45 megs), and started figuring out we could pass them back and forth.

When Peer-2-Peer sharing went to the masses, it changed the internet. Napster did that. It broke down the geek barrier of entry. The normal internet consumer realized they could become each others content providers. That was the tipping point.

The first ever social media was music. It went from record store conversations to consumable bits that anyone could pass around their own channels.

Blogs are just technology. But until we realized that we could provide each other with valid content, the vehicle wouldn’t be necessary.

As news gets closer to paid models online and goes the way of music, someone will be the Metallica-like example that we cite for years to come. But I truly believe that Mr. Fanning’s program was just a powerful a force in the open era of content than anything else out there – because it made it not only ok, but encouraged us, to share.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.