Facebook Timeline Apps: When it Comes to Health, it’s Fitness – For Now

Facebook’s quest on engagement and centering around activity and less around status updates from pages could mean that the power of apps that plug into the Timeline will be huge to actually getting people to do something. Last week’s announcement about Facebook’s new apps is important to keep an eye on based on who decides to get involved.

For me, I always look immediately to the health categories, and a very common trend among social media is present already. Flip through the categories and you’ll see the common denominator of news, music or other fun things to share (Food or Pinterest-like apps focused on Fashion and Shopping). I guess you could classify some of the food apps in the health category, but that’s stretching it.

What we do have, though, is the most social of the health category: fitness. Two competing apps (RunKeeper and MapMyFitness) are there to help you track fitness activities, connecting them with your friends and publishing them to your wall. Sociologically it all makes sense – those are things that you may share to show off an accomplishment or strive for moral support to hit a fitness goal. I’ve argued the social/peer pressure argument a lot in this context, and it certainly fits. They are also both solid apps (although I’ll admit I skew toward RunKeeper since it is Boston-based).

How do you take the other aspects of health beyond wellness and plug them into the timeline app feature? If apps are going to have a big impact on the Timeline and what appears in news feeds, getting involved in that avenue will be a clutch method of engagement. My gut is that the trajectory will next involve more social awareness/fundraising applications (Causes is also currently already a Timeline app), and turning that into health outlets for more public issues such as obesity or cancer research. Part of me wonders, though, what aspects of certain chronic conditions are (a) possible to track and (b) public enough that people actually would.

This one is definitely to be continued.


Chart of the Day: Your Tablet as the Evening News

I have thoughts on this, but even standing alone, it’s brilliant and makes a ton of sense: the tablet is fundamentally a reading/entertainment device. If you can connect a tablet app to some other primetime activity, perhaps there’d be something fascinating that could be done?

via PaidContent


Today in Commenting Irony

I could make a series out of comments like these, but this may be one of my all time favorites. From a post on THCB that is worthy to read on its own on health care and social media, this gem appeared in the commenting section:

I love when this stuff happens.


The Reddit Shark Jump May Be Coming

Gawker’s post on this is far too good. From fighting GoDaddy’s stance on SOPA to then going after bigger game and everything that could happen by way of that, will Reddit outgrow its stay? Methinks this is right:

Stories like this will make “the power of the Reddit hive mind” an inescapable meme of the 2012 race—replacing the old and busted “power of social media” trope.


Stat of the Day: New Levels of YouTube Dislikitidue

As of 12:45 ET on December 8, Rick Perry’s controversial campaign ad “Strong” has earned 181,393 dislikes and 3,916 likes over some 747,000 views (the Governor, in his wisdom, has not allowed comments). That’s almost 46 dislikes for every single person who liked the campaign, and an absurd 24.8 % engagement rate on the video.

In comparison, the nearly universally hated while loved “Friday” music video by Rebecca Black (on only its official post) clocks in at a measly 3.5 dislikes for every like and an engagement rate that is 3% (without comments) and 4.8% if you include the YouTube user free for all.

YouTube commenters would have had a field day with LBJ’s treatment of Barry Goldwater.


Quick Klout Rant

I just got hit up with a press release from the fine people at Klout. Look, I appreciate what you’re doing, and I honestly always read those because at least it’s directly from the horse’s mouth. Today, there was a sentence that bugged me in the newest release on some data analysis they did. Here’s the release:

We took a look at the life of a tweet for those with Klout Scores across the board and found that influencers with a Klout Score above 75 have a half-life up to *67 times longer* than those with a Score between 30 and 70. Messages from these high-scoring individuals stay active and meaningful for a very long time. No surprise these folks are influential.

What is killing me is that something got flipped along the way in the math here. I have no idea what a tweet half-life is. I was terrible at the life sciences. But I’m pretty sure that how high your Klout score is has absolutely no causal bearing on the likelihood of the tweet to extend its life-cycle. Maybe, and please feel free to admit this one whenever you feel, the people who push out those tweets that tend to live longer than most are in fact more likely to get a higher Klout score.

While I won’t go into my other concerns with the idea of tracking a score for influencing (as I like to say: Happiness isn’t a fish you can catch and influence isn’t a scoreboard), this at least riled me up just enough.


Quote of the Day: Spoiling Yourself on Twitter

“ Twitter is a big room full of people who are interested in the same stuff as you. So the statute of limitations for spoilers on Twitter is, for all intents and purposes, zero minutes zero seconds.”

-Dan Kois, in a post on the New York Times’ 6th Floor

Remember, you pick who you follow. Don’t follow people known for spoilers, I guess is the mentality here.

Is there a community out there for people who want to watch Chuck on tape delay this Sunday?


How to Get Around the Boston Globe Wall

The free trial of the new BostonGlobe.com pay-site has ended, so if you want to get behind that wall, it’ll cost you $3.99 a month.

Somewhat.

As noted in what I put together after last month’s Nieman Lab event, the wall is going to be a little leaky and the Globe brass are ok with that. With that in mind, here’s a few things to consider when you need access to content:

  • Google News is your friend. This has long been a trick when you need access to a Wall Street Journal article: copy the name of the article, search for it in Google News. Once the result comes up, click the link and the full article will be there.
There will be other hacks. I’m going to keep thinking about them.

Meetup’s Origins

A great email came through this morning from Meetup HQ, touching story of community in the face of 9/11/01 and how it led to the online-to-offline movement and application. The whole thing is here, but I thought this was a great quote to consider when it comes to the value and reason for what can be accomplished through the series of tubes:

A lot of people were thinking that maybe 9/11 could bring people together in a lasting way. So the idea for Meetup was born: Could we use the internet to get off the internet — and grow local communities?


Facebook, the Phone Number Privacy Brouhaha and Birthday Wall Posts

Just as with the changing of the taps on Sam Adams seasonal flavors, every few months or so we can be guaranteed another “OMG, Facebook is invading my privacy because of [x].” This time around? The uproar is that the mobile app for Facebook conveniently grabs any phone number of your friends that they have made public and allows you to access it from within your phone. Of course, the ability to access this was blown grossly out of proportion: some people thought those numbers were completely published or saved by Facebook. They weren’t, but who doesn’t love a good cut-and-paste status message on what Facebook is doing to us?

(Let the record show that the m.facebook.com version has had this phone book option for as long as I can remember accessing it. In fact, I remember talking years ago that it was one of my favorite features of the mobile version of Facebook because the time I’m most likely to need and/or use the number that a friend made public on their profile is when I’m using a phone. Utility! I digress.)

Facebook responded with a status message response on Wednesday, and it was generally helpful to nerds like me who read Terms of Service (Termses of Service? Terms of Servii?). I don’t know if that generally explains it well enough. Basically, Facebook encourages you to add your phone number when syncing with one of the apps – and you have full rights to control who sees it based on your levels of privacy.

Talking about phone numbers is complicated, though. So I’m going to change course but write about something that works the exact same way from a privacy standpoint: your birthday. In fact, the settings are really similar (in terms of you limiting who can see it), it is completely required to register your account and actually is promoted even more publicly to your friends.

I don’t have the luxury of historic screen shots, but I hope my memory doesn’t fail me too well.

In 2004 at launch, just like any registration online, Facebook requested the birthday of its users to validate age. This was the profile-only era of Facebook, no walls and certainly no news feed. Birthdays were listed on the page and could be removed from the public eye by the viewer. In 2005, when the pages were first update to include the walls, birthday was still present, but without the news feed, there was no other landing page to gather birthday information (although somewhere in the back pages, you could find a list by day of your friends birthdays – not at all unlike the list of contacts that you can find related to phone number).

The biggest change was when birthday information went from being on the profile page to the landing page – thanks to the late 2006 introduction of the News Feed. Sure, the information was “below the fold” of the screen, but it was public enough that people started more regularly using the occasion to post on friends’ walls. Of course, by the next year, those wall postings too started making the news feed and thus was the birth of the Facebook Birthday phenom. Now? The information on your contacts’ birthdays is in one of the most prominent places on the home page, and it’s probably the way most of your contacts interact with you. (David Plotz’s hysterical “My Fake Facebook Birthdays” is a delightful overview of the banality of these types of posts, but that’s just a worthy tangent).

Do you remember any sort of uprising when Facebook moved the information about your birthday to this public of a place? Probably not. You were bombarded with greetings from friends and contacts. It was enjoyable – and there was a pretty good user reason why Facebook made the change to coincide with existing habits of its members. Now think of phone numbers of your friends and contacts: it is just as easy to hide your birthday from different friends as it your phone number.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.