Quote of the Day: AP Fact Checking and The Frozen Four
Posted: April 9, 2010 Filed under: Department of Print, sports | Tags: #WeAreBC Leave a comment »“The Eagles are making their fourth Frozen Four appearance in five years. One more win will give them their fourth national title in three years and the fourth in school history.”
Associated Press, Game Story for BC’s 7-1 Win over Miami of Ohio.
That’s right, ladies and gentlemen, BC Coach Jerry York is so good he could win his fourth national title in three years. I’d like to see Geno Auriemma top that record. I haven’t taken a math class in awhile, but still, I’m a little suspicious.
Next time someone tells me bloggers aren’t responsible as journalists and don’t fact check, I’m pulling this up.

[Weekend Treat] 9 Days to Opening Day
Posted: March 26, 2010 Filed under: sports | Tags: Red Sox, weekend treat Leave a comment »
Dammit Nick Swisher, you ruin everything that is good in the world. Go Sox!
Everyman or Media Establishment? [Now on Mediaite]
Posted: March 25, 2010 Filed under: sports | Tags: Bill Simmons, mediaite Leave a comment »I’ve never denied how much of my writing style is influenced by Bill Simmons. My profile on his place in sports journalism – maybe caught completely between the fans and the ivory tower of media – is now up on Mediaite:
I will be among the first to admit he isn’t the pure commoner he once embodied. However, he still is putting himself out there from a very non-traditional place in the sports media world. He has such a distinct spot in the last decade of the Worldwide Leader, and not just on dot-com, but also because of his New York Times bestsellers, the 30 for 30 sports documentary series he produces and his star-studded podcast, The BS Report. He has a self-carved empire somewhere in the middle of “Booyah” and the screaming heads of Pardon The Interruption and Around The Horn.
Full post for your enjoyment is here.
Tiger’s Coming Back [Now On Mediaite]
Posted: March 16, 2010 Filed under: Department of News, sports | Tags: Masters, Tiger Woods Leave a comment »My latest Mediaite column on the overblown media hype that I expect to come with the news that Tiger Woods will be making his return to golf at this April’s Masters is now up:
This is my one appeal: let’s try and keep the excitement in check. I’m asking a lot, I know, of the sports media to not overplay a story. Don’t bill this as the return of the Prodigal Son – let’s not forget for a minute *why* Tiger has been missing from Golf since November and it wasn’t an excuse to avoid the 16th Hole at the Phoenix Open. We’ll watch – Tiger or No Tiger – mostly because it’s a major tournament that is one of the first signs that Spring is actually coming and golf season is upon us. I know most believe that Golf media lives and dies by the Swooshed-One, but let’s try and behave with some dignity.
Full post, as always, at Mediaite.
[Court Non-Rushing] Did Rick Reilly Just Rewrite an Old Pat Forde column?
Posted: March 4, 2010 Filed under: sports | Tags: pat forde, rick reilly 1 Comment »
In the sports pages of the DC area this morning, there is a lot of blowing up from Maryland’s victory over Duke in men’s hoops last night. In the excitement, the infamously rabid Terps fans rushed the court to celebrate the victory. Obviously, the hometowners are pretty happy, but there are still tons of Duke fans in the area, so I wasn’t surprised at all to see bunches of them posting yesterday’s conveniently-timed Rick Reilly column that lays the protocol for students should control their urges to rush the court.
I mean, telling excited college students at an athletic event their team just won to act in moderation is ridiculous in the first place. But that’s not what this post is about.
Reading through Reilly’s column this morning, I knew I’ve read that piece before. Maybe it’s because my alma mater once got accused of an unnecessary rush after beating a Top-10 Syracuse team ranked three spots below it in 2005, so I have a memory for it. Who wrote the rules from back then? A blogger? One of my friends in an e-mail?
Thank you Google: it was actually on ESPN.com and not some low-trafficked blog or reply all. In fact, it was written by Reilly’s own colleague, Pat Forde. Forde dedicated almost as many words to the “don’t rush” mantra in his weekly Forde Minutes in 2006.
OK, so Forde probably wasn’t the first writer to pen the “not every win is court-rush-worth,” either. But there are a ton of consistent themes in an article that also happens to be on the Web site where Reilly published his column.
Forde, 2006:
After watching all these giddy group gropes, it’s high time to publish the Forde Minutes Court-Storming Protocol Guide. Students are advised to read the following rules and to act accordingly the next time their team agitates them to the edge of hoops ecstasy:
Reilly, 2010:
This has got to stop. Therefore, here are the Ironclad and Unbreakable Rushing-the-Court Rules. From now on, you can NOT rush the court if …
Ok, so, it’s nothing earth shattering to try and become the authority on when college students can act with joy. But the reasons are where we get a ton of overlap. For example, there’s the “program superiority” clause:
Forde, 2006:
The Old Money Principle (2): Look up at the ceiling of your gym and count the banners. If your school has won three or more national titles in its history, you shall not rush the floor at any time. Schools affected: UCLA (11 titles), Kentucky (seven), Indiana (five), North Carolina (four), Duke (three).
Reilly, 2010:
- You’ve won an NCAA title in the past 20 years.
- You’ve been in the Final Four in the past five years.
While we’re on the topic of other prohibitions, here’s Forde’s list of storm worthy moments:
…court stormings should be reserved for: upsetting a top five team; knocking off an unbeaten league rival of particular dislike; ending a period of extreme and elongated futility against an arch rival; clinching a conference championship.
For the sake of contrast, here’s the list of no-go’s from Reilly:
- The team you just beat is not in the top three.
- Or is ranked within 15 rungs of you. (Somebody do the math for Wake.)
- Or is really a football school. This includes Florida, Texas and Ohio State. Get over it.
- You’ve beaten this same team in the past five years.
- You won the stupid game by more than 10 points. There is no such thing as a PRTC (Premeditated Rush The Court.)
Another staple to this type of column is the “exemption” clause. I.e., forget what I said about not rushing if you have a recent national championship banner:
First, the exemptions:
Forde, 2006
Condition B (5): Your august program defeats a top-five team on a suitably miraculous shot (25 feet or farther) at the buzzer, spurring spontaneous joy that overrides better impulses. (The Indiana-Illinois game went down to the wire, but it wasn’t won at the buzzer on a prayer.)
Reilly, 2010
You can rush the court if: [...] Something stupidly wonderful happens, like a 90-foot David Blaine Special goes in or an air ball bounces off the ref’s head to win your conference. Fine.
I just did a scan on Pat Forde’s Twitter, and I saw nothing referencing his old column in response to Reilly’s (but The Worldwide Leader has also come down pretty hard on anyone who mentions other ESPN talent in a vaguely negative light). I’m not calling theft or plagiarism on Reilly, I want that absolutely clear. Just a lack of originality.
[Weekend Treat] Olympic Hockey, Michael J. Fox and Goodnight, Canada
Posted: February 28, 2010 Filed under: sports | Tags: Vancouver Olympics Leave a comment »Finally – the moment has come when my month-long rant on Olympic coverage (slash obscure sports) is about to come to end with tonight’s closing ceremonies. As much as I’ve become a convert of the Stones-and-Sweepers events, my love of hockey has certainly grown stronger through a thoroughly entertaining Olympic tournament.
The gold medal game takes place this afternoon in Vancouver pitting our U.S. underdog squad against the Canadian favorites who also would like to rectify what happened last Sunday during the prelims. It’s going to be fantastic – and live on both coasts on NBC.
In the meantime, I’m hoping that we can make some tingling, patriotic moments for American Hockey to answer this pretty epic video shot for Canada and starring Michael J. Fox:
[YouTube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQJQLbLWuTE]
[Quote of the Day] Curling = Fine Wine
Posted: February 26, 2010 Filed under: sports | Tags: curling, Vancouver Olympics Leave a comment »“It is like drinking merlot.”
~Douglas A. Kass, the president of Seabreeze Partners, on Curling
When the closing bell has rung in the past few weeks, CNBC has been switching its coverage from the stock exchange to the sheets of ice up in the Vancouver Olympic Centre. According to the New York Times this morning, it’s making the financial analysts on Wall Street into all kinds of fans of curling.
“CNBC, whose market chatter is the background music on trading floors, switches to curling from Vancouver shortly after the closing bell.
“And so, after a day of braying for money in the markets, traders are winding down with curling. It is, fans say, a bit of after-market therapy. Curling is so slow and drawn out that it becomes mesmerizing.”
H/t Gawker
Hockey on MSNBC Was the Right Call [Now on Mediaite]
Posted: February 22, 2010 Filed under: sports | Tags: USA! USA!, Vancouver Olympics Leave a comment »
Ryan Kesler (L) celebrates with Zach Parise after his empty net goal ices the game for Team USA in the last minute. Image via AP
Watch the game last night? Better believe I did, but there’s been a pretty interesting conversation about NBC’s call to throw it on the cable news net MSNBC as opposed to showing it on network broadcast. Well, I think it’s the right call, and my argument is up over at Mediaite:
As exciting as this game was – and trust me, as an American college and pro hockey fan, I could not have asked for more in the upset – from a media planning standpoint, it always belonged on the cable channel. While some joked of conspiracy theories related to carrier coverage of MSNBC’s new HD channel, more level-headed minds note that there was a very good strategy behind the placement of it.
Crow, Eaten, Vancouver Style
Posted: February 18, 2010 Filed under: sports | Tags: Vancouver Olympics Leave a comment »After all that research, posturing about tape delays and social networking’s impact via spoilers, I officially must now eat crow:
American Idol had to settle for the silver medal for the first time in six years. It’s the first time Idol had lost a single half hour to its competition since 2004. NBC bested American Idol across the board from 9pm-10pm and in most demographics (though it was a tie with women 18-34).
In the 9pm hour Idol averaged a 6.9/17 rating /share with adults 18-49 to NBC’s 9.0/22. NBC averaged over 30 million viewers for that hour (30.065M) to FOX’s 18.42 million.
On the night NBC averaged an 8.9/23 rating/share with adults 18-49 and 29.26 million viewers overall.
Fueled by gold medal performances from the likes of Lindsey Vonn and Shaun White, NBC saw its best numbers of the games in Vancouver (though the opening ceremonies on Friday had more viewers).
Release via TV by the Numbers, but, hey, this is a major story given the level of complaints about the tape delaying strategy. Like everything else that happened in the last few weeks, I blame snow on the eastern seaboard.
[Weekend Treat] Understanding Curling
Posted: February 14, 2010 Filed under: sports | Tags: curling, Vancouver Olympics 2 Comments »I have not done anything to disguise my love for the Winter Olympics, and there are definitely certain events that I’m really looking forward to. It’s part humor (or is that humour?), part legitimate interest, but after watching way too much of it during 2006, I am nearly as excited for this year’s Curling bonspiel (that’s what they call the sport’s Round Robin Tournament) as I am for Olympic Hockey.
So, it isn’t the most well-known sport, but I got into it back during Torino because it was one of the few events that was broadcast live. Take into account I was a second semester Senior at BC, so it was a great mid-morning TV, not to mention it was the most successful the Americans had ever been in the sport, and the picture starts to make more sense.
Well, it doesn’t always make sense to everyone, but Uni Watch has a great guide to get everyone through the sport. Here’s the breakdown, thanks to the UW team:
4 guys (or gals) each throw a two rocks and try to get them to land in the “house” (that bullseye-type thing). Now, a good thrower can usually get the rock to stay in the house. But there is a reason the sport is called “curling” and that has to do with the way the rock is released and travels down the “sheet” (ice). You have probably noticed, if you have ever watched curling, that some members of the rink are carrying what look like giant squeegies or mops. These are called brooms, and are used to assist the rock on it’s journey toward the house. Sweeping in front of the moving stones can affect both the distance traveled, and the amount of curling a stone does on it’s way down the sheet of ice. Until recently the brooms resembled ordinary household cornbrooms.
[...]
Scoring is relatively simple. A team receives one point for each of their rocks that are within the house and are closer to the center than any of the opposition’s stones. Only one team can score points in an end. To score, a team must have stones within the house and closer to the “button” (the eye of the bullseye) than any of its opponent’s stones. Each stone that meets these criteria is worth one point…A full game consists of ten ends and the team with the most points at the end of the game is the winner!
I can’t imagine a sport I want to play more and/or could be competitive in on a global scale. Plus, when you get shots like this, how does it not remind you of something you’ve done in recreational games during college:
The final point is that it’s hard for me to argue with any sport that lends itself to puns. Especially when the US Curling Association so openly embraces them – the official site for the USCA is CurlingRocks.net – you know I’m completely on board.
The American men’s first match is on Tuesday morning at 9 a.m. PST against the Germans, right during the lunch hour here on the east coast. Meet the entire US Olympic team, both men’s and women’s rinks, here.
H/t to Brian of BC Interruption for sharing the UW link this morning.



